I’m just asking the question. Because I swear to God, that’s probably the only thing that would make Burstyn (not her real name) open her goddamn eyes to the horror that is the current president and his party.
Almost buried in today’s avalanche of today’s news (Huh, Sean Hannity? I did not see that coming.), was the following:
Evidence presented at Alexandre Bissonnette's sentencing hearing this morning includes a list of some of the Twitter accounts he was checking in the month before he killed six men at a Quebec City mosque. pic.twitter.com/Xdew4HbjkQ
— Andy Riga, Montreal (@andyriga) April 16, 2018
This seems like a random bit of information, and it’s hardly surprising that someone convicted for shooting up a mosque would be checking some of those accounts. Here’s the thing, though. There’s a non-zero amount of overlap between those twitter accounts and the list of accounts I know people in my family follow. I find that beyond disturbing. Granted, the overlap is with the milder end of the list, but I’m not sure how comforting I find that. Everyone on that list is on the spectrum (so to speak), and everyone on it is contributing to the current climate in negative ways. It frustrates me to no end that people in general can’t see that, especially when they’re my own flesh and blood.
…and with apologies to Spike Jones.
Anyone who continues to support Donald Trump is morally and intellectually deficient.
Why do Republicans continue to hope Trump isn’t what he is? I thought the P in GOP was for pedophile, but maybe it’s Pollyanna?
Prompted by “Sweet Jesus, Will the NYT’s Conservatives Ever Write About Anything but the “Intolerant Left” Ever Again?” There are links in that article to several articles covering basically the same topic, the idea that lefties are somehow shutting down free speech or otherwise exhibiting signs of what is broadly termed “intolerance.” So…I have thoughts.
First, this notion of a broadly “intolerant” left is bullshit, especially on college campuses. If anything, liberal colleges are tolerant to a fault. You may find heated arguments and vehement disagreement, but that’s a far cry from “intolerance.” In fact, I would argue that what we’re seeing now are the limits of tolerance. When you have a Republican president literally declaring that white supremacists and Nazis are “fine people,” you’re going to get some pushback. When that racism appears to be the animating principle behind conservatism, that pushback is going to be broad.
An aside— it’s worth checking out the Wikipedia article on “Paradox of tolerance.” The ideas there are highly relevant to this.
I’m willing to give a pass on the quantity of these articles, though. Editorial writers are paid to crank out words, and they write about what concerns or affects them. The sudden vehemence that Things Are Not Right and Conservatives Are Bad has to be a shock to the system, so I’m not surprised they’re spending ink on it. I’m sure there are similar articles ad nauseam about Trump’s incompetence, sexism, corruption, authoritarianism *deep breath*, nepotism, bigotry, and lies— don’t forget the lies as well.
Let me make this a little more personal. Since Trump became president, I have been much more aggressive in sharing articles with family members that I have ever been before. That’s a testament to the moment we’re in, where the Republican Party has gone seriously off the rails, and along with Trump appear to be willing to take the rest of the country off a cliff. Now, of the people I typically share things with, 40% are Republican voters. They watch Fox News and consume conservative media, I suspect almost exclusively. It didn’t take them long to ask me to leave them off the discussion, and I’m sure if they were to read any of the articles linked above, they would peg me as one of the “intolerant left”, for having the temerity to suggest that the candidates they support might be bigots. Granted, the implicit question about whether they are also bigots isn’t far away, but that’s been left unstated so far. Anyway, I have not respected their request. As a result, I’m pretty sure they’re blocking any emails from me, and I was explicitly told to no longer send Christmas or birthday gifts. So, who’s the intolerant one again?
At first the latest Hannity face plant seems extra ridiculous. I mean, come on– do they really think there were hidden images of sperm in Obama’s portrait? Sadly, right-wingers will buy anything, and this is probably something we’ll have to hear about the rest of our lives. However, it’s important to realize the idea isn’t completely bonkers. After all, there is a hidden dingleberry in DJT’s portrait. See if you can spot it:
No? Here, I’ll crop and zoom to make it easier to see:
Showing once again that if there’s one thing America can do in the age of Trump, it’s go downhill.
Wait, was that treasonous?
Just to be really clear about this, the top of the line is about 50/50. We’re wa-ay far from that point now.
Here’s a rough paraphrasing of the email exchange prompting this:
Person 1: Glad to see Flake and McCain challenging Trump.
Person 2: Pff. Those are just words. Flake votes with Trump most of the time.
Person 1: Yeah, but at least he’s speaking up, which is more than the rest of the GOP wusses.
I see this kind of back & forth a lot, and both points of view are right. Speaking up against the actions of the Trump administration isn’t nothing, but as they say, that and a quarter will get you a cup of coffee. Well, not a cup of coffee…maybe a gum ball from one of those vending machines outside the grocery store.
The biggest problem I have with people like Jeff Flake is that they’re trying to claim that Donald Trump is somehow an aberration in the GOP, instead of the logical outgrowth of its policies and actions. In fact, this is something I would argue is true of many “never Trumpers.” They fail to recognize that Trump is the embodiment of the modern GOP— hypocrisy, incoherence, xenophobia, racism, and all. The only question I have at this point is whether such people are lying only to us, or to themselves.